Bahaa
08-09-06, 10:40 AM
السلام عليكم
ارجو لو يستطيع احد ترجمة هذه المقالة التي كتبتها لاني بطيئ جدا في الطباعة باللغة العربية
و شكرا
ملاحظة: ارجو من المشرفين على الموقع ابقاء رسالتي في هذا القسم لاهمية الموضوع
"The War against Terror" is the title for the United States and its allies' ongoing war on alleged terrorism. It all began after the incident that occurred on the 11th of September 2001. Four airplanes were (according to the United States) hijacked by a group of "Al-Qaeda terrorists" led by "Osama Bin Laden" and crashed through several buildings in USA. Bin Laden was accused of masterminding these attacks, which most notably led to the collapse of the two towers at the WorldTradeCenter site in New York. What followed was that Islam was accused as being the religion of terrorists, Muslims all over world (especially in USA) were discriminated against, and the "war on terror" began. The U.S. and its allies invaded Afghanistan (the excuse was that it harbored Osama Bin Laden), destroyed the country and committed several atrocities against the Afghani people. The same happened to Iraq; the excuse being that Saddam posed a terrorist threat to the whole world and had weapons of mass destruction, which turned out to be untrue. Even now the U.S. and its allies see Iran as a major threat and a new war is waving across the horizon.
So far what the "war against terror" managed to do is achieve Israel's goals of eliminating any threat to it, taking control of resources and key ********s in Afghanistan and Iraq, weakening Muslims and Arabs, and committing inhuman crimes against thousands of people (mostly civilians). I am surprised why they still call it "the war against terror". Wouldn’t it be more suitable to call it "The War for Terror"? It makes more sense, seeing as to how much terror, grief, and cruelty it has caused so far. It is indeed a war by state terrorists against "real" humans; those who value life, peace, and human rights. What are the causes of this war? I think wars are sometimes won (at least temporarily) before they begin. The U.S. and its allies won this war on September 11 2001; they won the public's opinion that day, which gave them the excuse to launch the campaign against "terror". So, who was behind the Sept 11 attacks? Why should we believe that it's Al-Qaeda headed by Bin Laden? Why should this person be viewed as either a hero or a terrorist? The human brain can distinguish and can select between more than two different options. Maybe he is a U.S. agent (there are claims that he was at some point and if that's true, what makes him trustworthy now?). Maybe he does not exist and the tapes were fabricated, or maybe he died before Sept 11 occurred/ was captured and forced to record those tapes. The possibilities are many and we should not believe that there are only two choices.
Islam speaks against killing and targeting civilians (especially women and children) as occurred on Sept 11, yet you saw people in the Arabic and Islamic world celebrating the incident as a victory for Islam, and there are people to this day who still support it; despite the clear teachings of Islam and the damage the incident has brought upon Muslims and Arabs all over the world. It is understandable why people reacted in that manner (a reaction to the U.S. policy in the Middle East), but it isn't moral and it reached the west as a message that we do wish to see them (civilians) destroyed. This is what our enemy relied on and we took the bait. I was recently doing an internet search on Al-Qaeda; trying to find an article that depicts them as U.S. agents. I found something more logical than the current classification of this group and close to my own beliefs. Then I came across a website linking Israel to what happened on Sept 11 2001 (as the primary side behind the incident). I found something I had never thought off; the idea that the collapse of the world trade center towers and building no.7 could not have been caused by the airplanes that were allegedly hijacked and crashed into these buildings.
Basically, it was proven to defy the laws of nature and physics that the three buildings collapsed as a result of the fires from the plane crashes. I will summarize these points here and provide a link for those who would like to learn more about it.
1-Physically speaking, it's impossible for a building to collapse at free-fall speed (that's the speed of dropping an object from a high place under which there is nothing but air separating it from the ground). It is amazing how a building as tall as the tower at the world trade center can collapse within 7-8 seconds because it was hit by an airplane. In case explosives were planted in the underground levels of the building; however, it becomes entirely possible.
2- The two towers were supported by 47 steel columns each (in the core). Steel has a melting point far above the temperature that was achieved when the planes crashed, so there was no way the steel columns would go down the way they did as a result of an airplane crash.
3-The concrete in those 2 towers was literally pulverized; that means most of it was turned to small particles of dust, of extremely small radius. This can only occur in two cases; either as a result of a volcanic eruption (in which case part of the volcanic mountain may be destroyed and turned to ash) or as a result of a man-initiated explosion.
4-There were several cover-ups during the investigation. In the final report, they claimed that there were no steel columns inside the buildings, which was refuted by the head construction engineer of the two towers. There are other examples of cover-ups mentioned in the video provided in the link below.
5-People who were near the towers at the time of the incident felt and/or heard explosions coming from underground much AFTER the airplanes struck, and seismic waves were recorded at a nearby university lab.
6-A week before the incident, the power suddenly went off in New York.
Link to the video:
http://infowars.net/articles/August2006/210806Explosives.htm (http://infowars.net/articles/August2006/210806Explosives.htm)
Victor Thorn is a writer who recently published a book called: 9-11 Evil. He implicates Israel is behind the attacks. Here is the link: http://www.wingtv.net/thorn2006/911evilkaminski.html (http://www.wingtv.net/thorn2006/911evilkaminski.html)
I think we should fight this media war taking into advantage the current state Israel is in and the worldwide attention the Lebanon war has received. We should clean Islam's name and show who the real terrorists are. We are sick of being told terrorists and being blamed for what we didn't do. Let the whole world know about the Sept 11 conspiracy. The Zionists time is coming to an end Inshallah. I think we can create a team to spread this information through the internet pretty fast. We should visit suitable forums where such topics are discussed and state our opinions, much like the Zionists do. You see them everywhere expressing their narrow-minded opinions and defending Israel in the most absurd and irrational ways ever.
Last but not least, I would like to address all the Lebanese people who are currently divided between March 14 group and those allied with Syria (mua'aarada). I think now is not the time to poke each others and emphasize on all the "negative" things the opposite group has. Let the two groups settle their political differences and do not limit yourselves to following them; do not limit your viewpoints to theirs (think independently) and when they do mistakes acknowledge that they did for refusing to do so would only escalate the problem and would further divide us. We must agree that Israel and the ruling Zionist lobby in the U.S. are our enemies and we must focus on our enemy. Resenting Hizbollah for believing that it is Syria's and Iran's tool is a gift for Israel, and accusing the March 14 group of being Israeli/American agents is also a gift for Israel. Some Lebanese people do not need Israel's messages (manshoorat) to turn them against Hizbollah… At least do the opposite of what your enemy wants you to do!
Baha'a Chehab
From Beirut, Lebanon
ارجو لو يستطيع احد ترجمة هذه المقالة التي كتبتها لاني بطيئ جدا في الطباعة باللغة العربية
و شكرا
ملاحظة: ارجو من المشرفين على الموقع ابقاء رسالتي في هذا القسم لاهمية الموضوع
"The War against Terror" is the title for the United States and its allies' ongoing war on alleged terrorism. It all began after the incident that occurred on the 11th of September 2001. Four airplanes were (according to the United States) hijacked by a group of "Al-Qaeda terrorists" led by "Osama Bin Laden" and crashed through several buildings in USA. Bin Laden was accused of masterminding these attacks, which most notably led to the collapse of the two towers at the WorldTradeCenter site in New York. What followed was that Islam was accused as being the religion of terrorists, Muslims all over world (especially in USA) were discriminated against, and the "war on terror" began. The U.S. and its allies invaded Afghanistan (the excuse was that it harbored Osama Bin Laden), destroyed the country and committed several atrocities against the Afghani people. The same happened to Iraq; the excuse being that Saddam posed a terrorist threat to the whole world and had weapons of mass destruction, which turned out to be untrue. Even now the U.S. and its allies see Iran as a major threat and a new war is waving across the horizon.
So far what the "war against terror" managed to do is achieve Israel's goals of eliminating any threat to it, taking control of resources and key ********s in Afghanistan and Iraq, weakening Muslims and Arabs, and committing inhuman crimes against thousands of people (mostly civilians). I am surprised why they still call it "the war against terror". Wouldn’t it be more suitable to call it "The War for Terror"? It makes more sense, seeing as to how much terror, grief, and cruelty it has caused so far. It is indeed a war by state terrorists against "real" humans; those who value life, peace, and human rights. What are the causes of this war? I think wars are sometimes won (at least temporarily) before they begin. The U.S. and its allies won this war on September 11 2001; they won the public's opinion that day, which gave them the excuse to launch the campaign against "terror". So, who was behind the Sept 11 attacks? Why should we believe that it's Al-Qaeda headed by Bin Laden? Why should this person be viewed as either a hero or a terrorist? The human brain can distinguish and can select between more than two different options. Maybe he is a U.S. agent (there are claims that he was at some point and if that's true, what makes him trustworthy now?). Maybe he does not exist and the tapes were fabricated, or maybe he died before Sept 11 occurred/ was captured and forced to record those tapes. The possibilities are many and we should not believe that there are only two choices.
Islam speaks against killing and targeting civilians (especially women and children) as occurred on Sept 11, yet you saw people in the Arabic and Islamic world celebrating the incident as a victory for Islam, and there are people to this day who still support it; despite the clear teachings of Islam and the damage the incident has brought upon Muslims and Arabs all over the world. It is understandable why people reacted in that manner (a reaction to the U.S. policy in the Middle East), but it isn't moral and it reached the west as a message that we do wish to see them (civilians) destroyed. This is what our enemy relied on and we took the bait. I was recently doing an internet search on Al-Qaeda; trying to find an article that depicts them as U.S. agents. I found something more logical than the current classification of this group and close to my own beliefs. Then I came across a website linking Israel to what happened on Sept 11 2001 (as the primary side behind the incident). I found something I had never thought off; the idea that the collapse of the world trade center towers and building no.7 could not have been caused by the airplanes that were allegedly hijacked and crashed into these buildings.
Basically, it was proven to defy the laws of nature and physics that the three buildings collapsed as a result of the fires from the plane crashes. I will summarize these points here and provide a link for those who would like to learn more about it.
1-Physically speaking, it's impossible for a building to collapse at free-fall speed (that's the speed of dropping an object from a high place under which there is nothing but air separating it from the ground). It is amazing how a building as tall as the tower at the world trade center can collapse within 7-8 seconds because it was hit by an airplane. In case explosives were planted in the underground levels of the building; however, it becomes entirely possible.
2- The two towers were supported by 47 steel columns each (in the core). Steel has a melting point far above the temperature that was achieved when the planes crashed, so there was no way the steel columns would go down the way they did as a result of an airplane crash.
3-The concrete in those 2 towers was literally pulverized; that means most of it was turned to small particles of dust, of extremely small radius. This can only occur in two cases; either as a result of a volcanic eruption (in which case part of the volcanic mountain may be destroyed and turned to ash) or as a result of a man-initiated explosion.
4-There were several cover-ups during the investigation. In the final report, they claimed that there were no steel columns inside the buildings, which was refuted by the head construction engineer of the two towers. There are other examples of cover-ups mentioned in the video provided in the link below.
5-People who were near the towers at the time of the incident felt and/or heard explosions coming from underground much AFTER the airplanes struck, and seismic waves were recorded at a nearby university lab.
6-A week before the incident, the power suddenly went off in New York.
Link to the video:
http://infowars.net/articles/August2006/210806Explosives.htm (http://infowars.net/articles/August2006/210806Explosives.htm)
Victor Thorn is a writer who recently published a book called: 9-11 Evil. He implicates Israel is behind the attacks. Here is the link: http://www.wingtv.net/thorn2006/911evilkaminski.html (http://www.wingtv.net/thorn2006/911evilkaminski.html)
I think we should fight this media war taking into advantage the current state Israel is in and the worldwide attention the Lebanon war has received. We should clean Islam's name and show who the real terrorists are. We are sick of being told terrorists and being blamed for what we didn't do. Let the whole world know about the Sept 11 conspiracy. The Zionists time is coming to an end Inshallah. I think we can create a team to spread this information through the internet pretty fast. We should visit suitable forums where such topics are discussed and state our opinions, much like the Zionists do. You see them everywhere expressing their narrow-minded opinions and defending Israel in the most absurd and irrational ways ever.
Last but not least, I would like to address all the Lebanese people who are currently divided between March 14 group and those allied with Syria (mua'aarada). I think now is not the time to poke each others and emphasize on all the "negative" things the opposite group has. Let the two groups settle their political differences and do not limit yourselves to following them; do not limit your viewpoints to theirs (think independently) and when they do mistakes acknowledge that they did for refusing to do so would only escalate the problem and would further divide us. We must agree that Israel and the ruling Zionist lobby in the U.S. are our enemies and we must focus on our enemy. Resenting Hizbollah for believing that it is Syria's and Iran's tool is a gift for Israel, and accusing the March 14 group of being Israeli/American agents is also a gift for Israel. Some Lebanese people do not need Israel's messages (manshoorat) to turn them against Hizbollah… At least do the opposite of what your enemy wants you to do!
Baha'a Chehab
From Beirut, Lebanon